Car Videos 
2008 SEMA - 2010 Chevrolet Camaro
Length: 2:13
Description: Senior Editor, Edward Loh, shows us the wide-range of tuned Camaros Chevrolet brought to the SEMA show.
Author: motortrend
Source: YouTube
Related videos
Comments
They should have made that front end straight across. More retro. Whats with the beak? All around nice car though.
• EMPIRE0FLIES on 06-Jan-09
God those new Camaro's are bad ass! Those Camaros look so fast. I hope one day I GET TO DRIVE ONE
• 3357danny on 06-Jan-09
so when is Chevy going to remodel the Chevelle or the Nova? here comes a new wave of American muscle. screw global warming or gas prices, all you drama queens driving smarts and green cars are the problem to American business.
• 09mazdaspeed3 on 01-Jan-09
Think about what your saying..You really think a major car testing company would lie about some stupid fucking quarter mile time?? They're so fucking biased towards that ford let me fucking tell you..so much that it lost the comparison test...fucking dumbass...
• natedogg416 on 01-Jan-09
I'm not saying they would, I havent even checked your liability here. I'm saying if they do have it listed at 12.6 then yes they're lying...Dude I go to the track allll the time, and I can sure as hell say I've never seen a stock cobras running even high 12's...let alone mid to low 12's.
• TiKondaRoga on 01-Jan-09
So retard...maybe you can explain this...I went to your little MotorTrend buddies site, and they have the new Super Snake listed...it has 100 MORE HP then the GT500 and its rated at 12.3 in the 1/4...So ugh....How does a car with 100 less HP run only 3 tenths of a second slower?
• TiKondaRoga on 01-Jan-09
why do you think a 12.6 is that much faster than a 13? A bone stock Z06 has gotten into the 10s in the quarter. Different conditions and different driving styles make the difference. And also you are proving no point with the super snake doing 12.3..that's right where it should be. 100 more hp doesnt mean it magically has no more wheelspin making it able to post 11.5s all day.
• natedogg416 on 01-Jan-09
12.6 is alot faster then 13 flat jack ass...You do realize the faster you make your car, the harder it is to make it go even faster? But 12.3 from an $80k car versus 12.6 from a $50k car? Doesn't seem very logical to even make the two different cars does it? Go back to school moron.
• TiKondaRoga on 01-Jan-09
600 hp vs 500 hp is a very small percentage especially when its coming from the same chassis and differentials...fucking learn how to do math you dumb fuck. and pricing has nothing to do with it you little scrub.
• natedogg416 on 01-Jan-09
Wow a scrub? Damn dude...thats harsh <--- (sarcasm). 500-600hp is a huge difference moron. You obviously drive a Honda to be thinking like that...And how does price not make a difference? I think its stupid in general to pay $80k for a 12.3 car, when you could pay $70k for a Z06 and run 11.3's all day.
• TiKondaRoga on 02-Jan-09
They should have made that front end straight across. More retro. Whats with the beak? All around nice car though.
• EMPIRE0FLIES on 06-Jan-09
God those new Camaro's are bad ass! Those Camaros look so fast. I hope one day I GET TO DRIVE ONE
• 3357danny on 06-Jan-09
so when is Chevy going to remodel the Chevelle or the Nova? here comes a new wave of American muscle. screw global warming or gas prices, all you drama queens driving smarts and green cars are the problem to American business.
• 09mazdaspeed3 on 01-Jan-09
Think about what your saying..You really think a major car testing company would lie about some stupid fucking quarter mile time?? They're so fucking biased towards that ford let me fucking tell you..so much that it lost the comparison test...fucking dumbass...
• natedogg416 on 01-Jan-09
I'm not saying they would, I havent even checked your liability here. I'm saying if they do have it listed at 12.6 then yes they're lying...Dude I go to the track allll the time, and I can sure as hell say I've never seen a stock cobras running even high 12's...let alone mid to low 12's.
• TiKondaRoga on 01-Jan-09
So retard...maybe you can explain this...I went to your little MotorTrend buddies site, and they have the new Super Snake listed...it has 100 MORE HP then the GT500 and its rated at 12.3 in the 1/4...So ugh....How does a car with 100 less HP run only 3 tenths of a second slower?
• TiKondaRoga on 01-Jan-09
why do you think a 12.6 is that much faster than a 13? A bone stock Z06 has gotten into the 10s in the quarter. Different conditions and different driving styles make the difference. And also you are proving no point with the super snake doing 12.3..that's right where it should be. 100 more hp doesnt mean it magically has no more wheelspin making it able to post 11.5s all day.
• natedogg416 on 01-Jan-09
12.6 is alot faster then 13 flat jack ass...You do realize the faster you make your car, the harder it is to make it go even faster? But 12.3 from an $80k car versus 12.6 from a $50k car? Doesn't seem very logical to even make the two different cars does it? Go back to school moron.
• TiKondaRoga on 01-Jan-09
600 hp vs 500 hp is a very small percentage especially when its coming from the same chassis and differentials...fucking learn how to do math you dumb fuck. and pricing has nothing to do with it you little scrub.
• natedogg416 on 01-Jan-09
Wow a scrub? Damn dude...thats harsh <--- (sarcasm). 500-600hp is a huge difference moron. You obviously drive a Honda to be thinking like that...And how does price not make a difference? I think its stupid in general to pay $80k for a 12.3 car, when you could pay $70k for a Z06 and run 11.3's all day.
• TiKondaRoga on 02-Jan-09